Year I Visit Flamborough Head
‘My favourite part of the day was Mrs Cameron doing Kung Fu Geography lying on the beach.’ Not, perhaps, exactly what you would expect from a Geography Field Trip but at QM we like to do things differently and on 5th May 2011 ‘Year I went to Flamborough Head to go and study cliffs, sea erosion and rocks.’ ‘It was a very windy day but we had lots of fun and learnt a lot’ At the coast the girls saw ‘lots of massive rocks [showing] evidence that they had been worn away’ and explored ‘the fastest eroding coast in Europe!’ All the girls agreed that the ‘trip was very interesting’ and ‘it was fun and educational.’ There were many high points of the trip including going ‘down onto the beach where we looked at the cliffs and went in some caves which was fun.’ Year I not only had a great time but also ‘learnt some very fascinating facts’, ‘what fascinated me the most was the chalk which we touched was 90 million years old.’ In conclusion ‘we had a fantastic time going to beaches to see what our teachers were really talking about in our Geography lessons.’
Many thanks go to Year I who helped compile the above report which was taken from their individual reports of the day.
Sixth Form Debate
On Wednesday 2nd March teams of LVI geography and politics students went head-to-head in a heated debate over the a local issue and the effects it would have in the area. The motion was “This house believes that the proposed development of North Selby mine poses a threat to the environment”.
Proposing the motion were politicians Octavia Cobb, Violet Manners and Sarah Good, and opposing were geographers Molly Kinnaird, Chloe Dodson and Louise Crosby. All the speakers had done thorough research and had composed strong and compelling speeches. The audience was entertained and informed with shocking pollution figures, detailed chemical analysis and a variety of highly emotive facts.
The proposition emphasised the potential problems for local residents and wildlife, including congestion of the A19 and the potential loss of endangered species. On the other hand, the opposition focussed on the benefits that the centre would have for research and how it could contribute towards the fight against global warming.
After all six girls had spoken there was a chance for the audience to get involved and ask the speakers questions, which the girls handled well. After tough competition from each side and persuasive arguments from all speakers, the audience voted in favour of the opposition. This was a great evening that was entertaining, informative and thought-provoking.